Free Essays on Chad Whisnant

The Long Route Home: On July 25, 1946, two young black couples- Roger and Dorothy Malcom, George and Mae Murray Dorsey-were killed by a lynch mob at the Moore’s Ford Bridge over the Appalachee River connecting Walton and Oconee Counties (Brooks, 1). The four victims were tied up and shot hundreds of times in broad daylight by a mob of unmasked men; murder weapons included rifles, shotguns, pistols, and a machine gun. â€Å"Shooting a black person was like shooting a deer,† George Dorsey’s nephew, George Washington Dorsey said (Suggs C1). It has been over fifty years and this case is still unsolved by police investigators. It is known that there were atleast a dozen men involved in these killings. Included in the four that were known by name was Loy Harrison. Loy Harrison may not have been an obvious suspect to the investigators, but Harrison was the sole perpetrator in the unsolved Moore’s Ford Lynching case. The motive appeared to be hatred and the crime hurt the image of the state leaving the town in an outrage due to the injustice that left the victims in unmarked graves (Jordon,31). Many African Americans lived on farms and tended for white landowners. Bob Hester was a landowner, on this farm the Moore’s Ford Lynching began. On July 14, Roger Malcom followed Dorothy Malcom to Hester’s farm, Roger was arguing with her. According to the original FBI report, Hunter 2 Hester’s son, Barney, told Malcom to leave. As he was leaving a fight broke out between Malcom and Hester. Malcom then pulled out a knife and stabbed Hester in the chest. The reason for the argument is uncertain although at that time Barney Hester may have been having an affair with Dorothy Malcom. One of the neighbors said that the black community felt it had more to do with sex than anything else did (Suggs,C1). After the fight broke out, Barney Hester was taken to the hospital and Roger Malcom was taken to jail. On the morning before the lynching s, Harrison d... Free Essays on Chad Whisnant Free Essays on Chad Whisnant The Long Route Home: On July 25, 1946, two young black couples- Roger and Dorothy Malcom, George and Mae Murray Dorsey-were killed by a lynch mob at the Moore’s Ford Bridge over the Appalachee River connecting Walton and Oconee Counties (Brooks, 1). The four victims were tied up and shot hundreds of times in broad daylight by a mob of unmasked men; murder weapons included rifles, shotguns, pistols, and a machine gun. â€Å"Shooting a black person was like shooting a deer,† George Dorsey’s nephew, George Washington Dorsey said (Suggs C1). It has been over fifty years and this case is still unsolved by police investigators. It is known that there were atleast a dozen men involved in these killings. Included in the four that were known by name was Loy Harrison. Loy Harrison may not have been an obvious suspect to the investigators, but Harrison was the sole perpetrator in the unsolved Moore’s Ford Lynching case. The motive appeared to be hatred and the crime hurt the image of the state leaving the town in an outrage due to the injustice that left the victims in unmarked graves (Jordon,31). Many African Americans lived on farms and tended for white landowners. Bob Hester was a landowner, on this farm the Moore’s Ford Lynching began. On July 14, Roger Malcom followed Dorothy Malcom to Hester’s farm, Roger was arguing with her. According to the original FBI report, Hunter 2 Hester’s son, Barney, told Malcom to leave. As he was leaving a fight broke out between Malcom and Hester. Malcom then pulled out a knife and stabbed Hester in the chest. The reason for the argument is uncertain although at that time Barney Hester may have been having an affair with Dorothy Malcom. One of the neighbors said that the black community felt it had more to do with sex than anything else did (Suggs,C1). After the fight broke out, Barney Hester was taken to the hospital and Roger Malcom was taken to jail. On the morning before the lynching s, Harrison d...

Can a Recruiter Help You Find the Perfect Healthcare Job

Can a Recruiter Help You Find the Perfect Healthcare Job Graduation is over, and now you are looking for a job in health care. There are jobs available. and your credentials are great. Getting the job is one third training, one third hard work and one third moxie. Looking to people who are trained to put you in the job market may seem like a good idea. Many recruiters have a background in human resources and the contacts that are necessary to find work. However, having a recruiter is not for everyone, and deciding where you fit in is key. Needing a RecruiterNot everyone needs a recruiter. There are great job search sites available that let you search for yourself. Jobs that are more complex might benefit from a recruiter’s input. Deciding whether it is right for you takes forethought.Connecting With Your RecruiterFinding a recruiter that wants to know what you want in a job, how you feel about doing the work you do and what sort of work/life balance you are looking for is essential. This is a two-way street; however, and keeping you r recruiter informed and up to date is important. A good recruiter will answer your questions honestly no matter if the truth is difficult to take. If a recruiter treats you professionally, that is a plus. If the recruiter becomes aggressive on the phone, it is not a good sign.Looking for the Right RecruiterChecking out a recruiter can be done online. Looking at the recruiter’s website may tell you how successful he or she is. Many recruiters will post a client list and where they found jobs for their clients. Although some health care jobs are attained by promoting from within, not all companies do that. Finding a recruiter who knows people at a hospital might mean that when a job for which you are qualified becomes available, the recruiter will hear about it early on and mention it to you.Getting referrals for a recruiter is a good idea. Friends, family or a source book helps you choose. Send your resume to several recruiters, then call them. This gives you and the recruite r an introduction to one another, and it’s simpler to see how well you sync with them.Determine the Recruiter’s EmployerThere are two types of recruiters: internal and external. An internal recruiter works directly for a company. It’s easy to spot since their email will most likely note that. Remember, this type of recruiter is like meeting with corporate, so dress and act appropriately for a meeting. External recruiters usually work for a recruiting company. Other external recruiters are independent, and checking out their experience and training is necessary.Check to See If the Recruiter Is ReputableChecking out the recruiter is easier than many job seekers think. Looking at the recruiter’s credentials or on LinkedIn might give you an idea how long he or she has been in business. It can also reveal a history of working with different companies, and the jobs the recruiter might have available. Remember, a recruiter does not try to find jobs for someone s eeking employment. Rather, a recruiter tries to find the right employee for a particular job. Sometimes, recruiters work on commission, causing them to become aggressive, which could dash the job seeker’s employment chances. Ask the recruiter about their experience and how often a job match was found for employers and employees. It’s also important to find out if the recruiter is representing an employer directly or is trying to approach an employer with candidates.Choosing TheJobNetwork is one way to search for jobs without complications. Whether you are looking for health care jobs or others, this job search site works for you 24/7 as it searches through job listings until it finds jobs that meet your wishes and job skills. This free job search platform makes sure you receive an email notice of jobs as soon as the opportunity becomes available.

Can a Recruiter Help You Find the Perfect Healthcare Job

Can a Recruiter Help You Find the Perfect Healthcare Job Graduation is over, and now you are looking for a job in health care. There are jobs available. and your credentials are great. Getting the job is one third training, one third hard work and one third moxie. Looking to people who are trained to put you in the job market may seem like a good idea. Many recruiters have a background in human resources and the contacts that are necessary to find work. However, having a recruiter is not for everyone, and deciding where you fit in is key. Needing a RecruiterNot everyone needs a recruiter. There are great job search sites available that let you search for yourself. Jobs that are more complex might benefit from a recruiter’s input. Deciding whether it is right for you takes forethought.Connecting With Your RecruiterFinding a recruiter that wants to know what you want in a job, how you feel about doing the work you do and what sort of work/life balance you are looking for is essential. This is a two-way street; however, and keeping you r recruiter informed and up to date is important. A good recruiter will answer your questions honestly no matter if the truth is difficult to take. If a recruiter treats you professionally, that is a plus. If the recruiter becomes aggressive on the phone, it is not a good sign.Looking for the Right RecruiterChecking out a recruiter can be done online. Looking at the recruiter’s website may tell you how successful he or she is. Many recruiters will post a client list and where they found jobs for their clients. Although some health care jobs are attained by promoting from within, not all companies do that. Finding a recruiter who knows people at a hospital might mean that when a job for which you are qualified becomes available, the recruiter will hear about it early on and mention it to you.Getting referrals for a recruiter is a good idea. Friends, family or a source book helps you choose. Send your resume to several recruiters, then call them. This gives you and the recruite r an introduction to one another, and it’s simpler to see how well you sync with them.Determine the Recruiter’s EmployerThere are two types of recruiters: internal and external. An internal recruiter works directly for a company. It’s easy to spot since their email will most likely note that. Remember, this type of recruiter is like meeting with corporate, so dress and act appropriately for a meeting. External recruiters usually work for a recruiting company. Other external recruiters are independent, and checking out their experience and training is necessary.Check to See If the Recruiter Is ReputableChecking out the recruiter is easier than many job seekers think. Looking at the recruiter’s credentials or on LinkedIn might give you an idea how long he or she has been in business. It can also reveal a history of working with different companies, and the jobs the recruiter might have available. Remember, a recruiter does not try to find jobs for someone s eeking employment. Rather, a recruiter tries to find the right employee for a particular job. Sometimes, recruiters work on commission, causing them to become aggressive, which could dash the job seeker’s employment chances. Ask the recruiter about their experience and how often a job match was found for employers and employees. It’s also important to find out if the recruiter is representing an employer directly or is trying to approach an employer with candidates.Choosing TheJobNetwork is one way to search for jobs without complications. Whether you are looking for health care jobs or others, this job search site works for you 24/7 as it searches through job listings until it finds jobs that meet your wishes and job skills. This free job search platform makes sure you receive an email notice of jobs as soon as the opportunity becomes available.

Military discourse Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Military discourse - Essay Example It is inevitable rivalries will arise due to the intense competitive and fighting spirit of all military personnel that results from the very nature of their jobs. In this regard, this paper will examine some of the unique military discourses of the Ground Forces of the Army to which I belonged. The Ground Forces of any armed forces is usually the biggest and most well-funded unit of the military service of a country. This is because it forms the bulk of military personnel needed to fight a war which is usually fought on land. Because of their size, members of the Ground Forces feel a sense of entitlement and priority when it comes to military appropriation for their budget such as that used for the acquisition of weaponry. The nature of war makes it imperative for a military unit to be flexible which is why it happens there is an overlap of the functions of each service. When this happens, rivalries arise due to encroachment of functions and a threat to a service branchs primary responsibilities. The rivalry can intensify to a point of being destructive such as a lack of cooperation although it can improve the esprit de corps. Obedience – being a member of the Ground Forces, I was witness to many of its rules regarding military discipline to maintain unit cohesion. Discipline is the backbone by which the ranked hierarchy is being reinforced daily through total obedience. Discipline is instilled in all recruits right from the very beginning, at the start of their training. The most important rule to remember is the notion of â€Å"obey first before you complain† which is second nature to every military person.

German Photomontage in 1920s and 1930s Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

German Photomontage in 1920s and 1930s - Essay Example Hoch was raised in a conventional, middle-class, small-town family. She moved to Berlin during World War I to study art and work for a women's magazine. It was during these years that she became a member f Berlin Dada. She showed her works regularly with the Dada group but did not establish an international reputation as an artist until after the Dada movement had fallen apart. Cut With The Kitchen Knife includes more than 150 illustrations f works Hoch created during 1918-1933, the Weimar years. Hoch assembled her montages by selecting photographs f women from illustrated print sources and juxtaposing them with fragments f scenes from Weimar and German colonial society. Readers will be intrigued by the surprising even shocking compositions which combine the pleasure f viewing mass media images with critical, even destructive feelings about the subject matter. Maud Lavin offers both interpretation and critical analysis f these montages. (Freud 1955, 145-72) Unless you're very knowledgeable, German art in the twentieth century has been done by men, and German women in the twentieth century have been reduced to the equation Woman=Nature, to child-like whores or to old whores, or the scary, brittle, maneating New German Woman. Masks. What a delight to discover the work f Hannah Hoch (1889-1978). The Walker Art Center has mounted an exhibition f her photomontages which will travel from there to the Museum f Modern Art and to the Los Angeles County Museum f Art. The Photo-montages f Hannah Hoch is the catalogue for the exhibition. "Photomontage" (associated with the German word montieren, to assemble or to fit,) was used by the Berlin Dadaists to describe their piecing together f photographic and typographic sources, usually cut from the printed mass media. The Dadaists enjoyed the mechanica--and proletarian--connotations f the term and used it to distinguish their work from Cubist collage. Although Hannah Hoch worked in other media--useful black and white reproductions f her drawings and oil paintings accompany the text--all her work contained the elements she perfected in the photomontages she made for nearly sixty years. (Burgin 1982, 177-216) The obligatory scholarly essays describing Hoch's life and work are inoffensive and useful But the colour plates are glorious. One hundred and nine reproductions are accompanied by a brief bit f text commenting on a play f words in the tide f a work or providing an historical detail or biographical sketch f a ballerina or industrialist or describing how the original mass media sources were manipulated by the artist. This detail, small colour reproductions f the original sources, conveys the creativity f the curators f this catalogue. Showing how a reproduction f drapery from an advertisement was cut, fumed on its side, and conjoled into becoming waves on the surface f water is magic. Somehow words, the right words, said about a work f art make the work f art visible. Magic. The Photomontages, naturally, conveys the same old sad story f the boys refusing to acknowledge that a girl had played in

The ministry of education Essay Example for Free

The ministry of education Essay The popular image of Japan as a homogeneous and harmonious is not nearly as valid as it seems. The aspects of Japan which could be argued are of this nature are enforced by both Western media and the impressions that Japanese society and media gives out. Japanese society has always strived and aspired toward this ideal, to such an extent, that an impressive illusion of homogeneity and harmony has been created. This is probably not something which many native Japanese consciously consider; it is more likely that many of them believe the illusion as much as Westerners do. There is a great deal of cultural diversity in Japan, which, although greatly increased in the post-war period, was previously more heterogeneous than one might initially imagine. Likewise, the impression of harmony which Japan emits is quite far from the truth in more than a few aspects of society. One of the more recent examples of this conflict within Japanese society is the intermittent uproar over the politicized nature of the school system. Some see Japan as a land of opposites and contrast. From the ancient temples in the middle of nowhere to the gargantuan glass skyscrapers which tower over the metropolis that is Tokyo. The farmer and the city businessman. The fantastic technological advancements which come from a culture which still adheres closely to ancient traditions and rituals (some of which have been assimilated from other cultures, especially the Chinese). However, the Japanese illusion of homogeneity still holds relatively fast over this school of thought. This is because society itself endeavours to impresses a sense of group effort over the entire nation. This means that an employee in Japan has a greater understanding of the role he or she fills within at least their immediate sphere of work environment. The idea of this is to encourage employees to work for the benefit of the group (essentially, the nation) and not for their own personal gain. The society of today views Japan as a country of strong culture and a disciplined and uniform nature. The Japanese workforce is thought of as hardworking, loyal and verging on selfless when it comes to personal (or family related) sacrifice if required. This applies primarily to the Japanese white collar office workers (sarariman), but a similar work ethic is preferred in almost all occupations. Japanese women are generally portrayed as motherly housewives; they appear to play a relatively small part in the business world and are equally not directly very active in political matters. Those few Japanese women who have been recognised as beneficial to their society and culture have been affiliated with the arts. Japanese family life is viewed as at worst amicable. The offspring are obedient and seem happy to learn about and follow the culture and traditions of the previous generations. Japanese schooling has proven to be one of the most successful educational styles to date. The Japanese have always put a great emphasis on formal learning, students most often simply memorising information parrot-fashion. Although very different to Western schooling where far more free thought is promoted, Japanese schooling seems very effective for them. With ninety-four percent of students attending senior high school and around a third of these going on to higher education, Japanese Universities turn out a sizeable number of graduates on an annual basis. If you were to ask a random inhabitant of a Western nation what comes to mind when they think of Japan, youll probably get answers along the lines of: Samurai, sushi, sumo and sake. Geishas and gadgets, chopsticks and haikus. Bonsai trees and the expertly crafted gardens which come hand in hand with them Certainly, these are elements of Japanese culture, but they are by no means as prominent within society as we are led to believe (chopsticks excluded). For example, there are incredibly few genuine Geisha girls. They have become a piece of heritage which has faded in both functionality and popularity since the technological boom hit Japan. The aforementioned sarariman model is one of the prime images the Japanese choose to utilise to promote their nation in the eyes of the world. Seen as something of the epitome of homogeneity and harmony, the life of the sarariman is very much orientated around his career. Putting his work before his family, the office worker is looked after very well by his employers if he performs well. Businesses help their employees by finding them accommodation, lending money and even going as far as to set some of them up with wives. As a result of this, the sarariman do not get much chance to spend time with their families, overtime will often if not always be worked where needed and should you be required to transfer department, quite often the families would be left behind. The companies do this in an attempt to increase the employees dependence on the company so they are less likely to seek employment elsewhere which is practically impossible to do. Many firms are reluctant to employ anyone who has left another firm, especially straight onto the same wage. This seems to be something of an unwritten law amongst businesses designed to keep ones employees faithful to the company. most Japanese tend to work in one job or for one firm for their entire lives. Again, this reinforces the group ethic which the Japanese government seems to be so eager to impress. History textbooks (particularly concerning the 20th Century war periods) are something of tomes of propaganda which, instead of presenting facts and deriving opinions from such facts, the opposite is done. That is, to present a take on a historical event and then to attempt to support this usually biased view with carefully chosen statistics. The Japanese seem very reluctant to admit to mistakes from their past, and have gone as far as to pass a law which states that all educational textbooks must be approved by the Ministry of Education.

Oedipus The King :: Oedipus Rex, Sophocles

Oedipus The King; Did the prophecy cause his destiny?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Undoubtedly there has been a tremendous amount of speculation and dissection of this play by countless people throughout the ages. I can only draw my own conclusions as to what Sophocles intended the meaning of his play to be. The drama included a number of horrific and unthinkable moral and ethical dilemas, but I believe that was what made the play so interesting and that is exactly the way Sophocles intended it to be. The play was obviously meant to entertain and portray the author’s own insight. The underlying theme to the play is that no man should know his own destiny, it will become his undoing. This knowledge of things to come was presented to both Laius and Oedipus in the form of prophecies well in advance of it coming to be. The prophecies told of things that were so morally disturbing that they both aggressively did everything in their power to try and stop them from coming true. The story begins with Oedipus at the height of power as King of Theb es. His kingdom has encountered rough times and he has sent his nobleman Creon to seek help from the god Apollo to restore his land. Creon tells Oedipus that he must find the murderer of the previous King Laius and by finding this man and banishing him, his land will be restored. The murder occurred some time ago and King Oedipus sends for the seer Theiresias with his powers of prophecy to aid in the search for the murderer. Sophocles cleverly projects his feelings on wisdom and knowledge through Teirsias when he says â€Å"Alas, how terrible is wisdom when it brings no profit to the man that’s wise!†(23) Teirsias knows that this terrible prophecy has already been set into motion and the damage has already been done. There is really no point in telling it to Oedipus because it will only cause more harm than good. Oedipus provokes Teirsias into telling him the prophecy, â€Å" à  tell you, king, this man, this murderer-he is here. In name he is a stranger among citiz ens but soon he will be shown to be a citizen true native Theban, and he’ll have no joy of the discovery: blindness for sight and beggary for riches his exchange, he shall go journeying to a foreign country tapping his way befor him with a stick.